Wednesday, June 18, 2008

The Woman Who Thought She Could

Of course Hillary had a better chance against McCain than Obama. However, the Democratic party seems to have given up on the presidency. Obama's only selling point is that he's an underdog. American hasn't officially had a "black" president, so that is what he has to offer.

As a politician, his record is one of intense mediocrity. His only marketable quality is the color of his skin. This is unfortunate for the democrats. In a presidential election you hope to have candidates that are appealing to both parties. There is no sense in finding the candidate that your party likes if he's not going to get elected.

It's one thing to win a party nomination, but quite another to win a general election. In this case, Hillary was the candidate with the highest potential to win general, but was overshadowed by the parties internal enamor with Obama.

Do the Democrats simply not want the presidency during these troubles times? Are they attempting to show at the general election by placing a solid second place runner in a two man race? What would be the advantage other than avoiding responsibility during troubled times? Could it be another chip in the game to say we've been ignored by racists when the truth is they put up a candidate with nothing more than race to offer?

Of course many Democrats will say that racism or corruption prevented them from winning this election. The truth however, is that the Democrats purposely created the scenario for failure. Sadly, the country and the Republicans will receive the blame.

When people complain about racism or corruption, just remind them that they had a good chance before they decided to lose with Obama. It's not likely that they didn't understand that a majority of Democrats chasing eye candy is not the target audience for a general election.

No comments:

The Mortgage Crisis

The mortgage crisis could not have been an accident. The people that "approved" the mortgages KNEW that:

  1. Were going to have prohibitive payments in 12 to 24 months
  2. Were going to be on property worth far less than what they sold for within 12 to 24 months
  3. Would be forclosed on because they couldn't sell for the amount of the mortgage

Bankers blame it on homeowners making bad decisions or not having foresight. However, those bankers get very uncomfortable when you point out that these mortgage were all approved by bankers that get PAID to know the market and it's trends.

When you point out that regular people like you and I saw this coming back in 2004/2005, they start to tap their fingers and look around nervously.

The short answer is that they set us up and we don't know "why".

Mortgages traditionally require people prove they can make the payments even when the market is not headed down. The banks knew exactly what they were doing...

The Media On It's Knees

Why is it that the mainstream media is clamoring on their knees in front of Obama as if their unwarranted affection will somehow lower his zipper and give them what they so desperately seem to want?